The groups were broken down between primary forward and defense. I used my best judgement because I can. This is completely stat based, and I can only grade on stats entered on the website. Forwards got rewarded more for offensive stats and Defense for more defense stats. The rating is based on distance away from the league average for the week. You get positive points for being above the average and negative points for being below the average. If you are a complete average player across the board your rating will be “0”. The grades then are evaluated to try and level load the ratings so there isn’t 1 A and 1000 Fs because one fucktard ruined for everyone.
Abnormalities as I looked at it Boston dominated takeaways and giveaways having 18 takeaways and 1 giveaway in 2 games. averaging 9 takeaways a game to 0.5 giveaways put him vastly above the average and takeaway/giveaways was a high factored D stat. Also was plus 8 for the week. Mostly messing with factors and weights generally just moved the range rather than reduced the differences. So just going to leave it as Boston had a significantly better stat week then average.
For a little more transparency here was the weekly average stats per position
Stats
F AVG
D AVg
G/GM
1.10
0.24
A/GM
1.29
1.00
S/GM
3.79
1.49
PIMS/GM
0.66
0.47
P/M/GM
0.22
-0.23
H/GM
2.70
2.68
FW/GM
4.33
0.27
TKA/GVA
1.03
2.29
TKA/GM
7.15
8.29
GV/GM
8.46
5.63
HT/GM
0.12
0.01
BS/G
0.58
1.18
Using those league averages weights and points were determined and ratings assigned.
